What Really Works For Crime Prevention And Rehabilitation
The application of harsh means in addressing crimes only serves to heighten their rates. Ideally, lengthening verdict does not translate to crime mitigation but rather increased incarceration rates (Radhakrishnan, 2017). There is always a rising need to address criminal cases, but there is no best way to do it. In the past, some researches have proposed that ‘nothing works’ (Radhakrishnan, 2017). This contributed to tougher punishments which did not seem to work. Current researches and reviews on the past ones have however revealed that there is a lot that works, perhaps everything works only that the legal institutions do not follow the correct methodologies. More often, we give up and run into conclusions without adequate consideration of the matters at hand. So what really works and what doesn’t? This is a Student Sample ORDER YOUR PAPER NOW
According to (Weisburd, Farrington, & Gill, 2017), there is a lot that works though not everything. The research article: What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation: an Assessment of Systematic Reviews provides a systematic approach by minimizing the possible bias in making conclusions. This is made effective by stating precise criteria for exclusion and inclusion of research reports. By conducting an extensive examination of eligible researches and ensuring transparency and explicitness, the reviewers were able to propose an essential guide to what ought to be done in crime prevention and rehabilitation. The replication of the methods stated in the review could improve public safety and mitigate criminal case. Basically, the review puts more emphasis on the effectiveness of community policing and addressing the propagators of crime.
The setting up of police stations in every single village will not address the growing rates of crime. Establishing a powerful community policing could be of much help. This will help in gaining insights and also addressing the underlying aspects that lead to offensive behaviors. There is much evidence that there are particular risks social dynamics that have been associated with criminal practices and tackling such can see the nations achieve a momentous decline in criminal activities. The most prevalent risk factors include substance addiction, gang formation, poverty and inadequate housing facilities, lack of parental guidance, school dropouts, unemployment, domestic violence and economic segregation. There is no single shortcoming that can lead to offensive involvements; chances are that multiple factors push people to criminal behaviors. The limited abilities to overcome such challenges lead to offenses.
The countries which top in the risk factors are the most likely to have the highest criminal cases. If the governments of such countries increase their effort and expenditure on hiring more police officers and building prison facilities, they will be further worsening the situation. Instead, they should consider investing in education, health services, and housing facilities. Perhaps, some criminals should be made to undergo life sentences. However, most criminal cases can be explained by various risk factors. Therefore, to ensure a permanent dent in criminal figures, there is need to deal with the fundamental risk factors. Many crime prevention and rehabilitation programs work only the coercive approaches fail. This is a Student Sample ORDER YOUR PAPER NOW
Radhakrishnan, P. (2017, July 21). Verdict 2017 debate on rising crime: What really works for crime prevention. Retrieved December 1, 2017, from The Indian Weekender: https://www.indianweekender.co.nz/Pages/ArticleDetails/104/8219/Verdict-2017/Verdict-2017-debate-on-rising-crime-What-really-works-for-crime-prevention
Weisburd, D., Farrington, D. P., & Gill, C. (2017). What Works in Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(2), 415-449.